Phoenix Five
Earth Changes Bulletin  - The Economic Trends

copyright and edited by Michael Wells Mandeville

 

Monitoring The Changes In The Earth

ALERTS  |  GEOPHYSICAL  |  GEOPOLITICAL  |  SPIRITUAL  | TRANSFORMATIONS


ARCHIVE  |  HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  UNSUBSCRIBE

 

 

[11-06-06] EUR0PEAN UNION ECONOMIC FORECAST

Autumn economic forecasts 2006-2008: solid growth and unemployment and deficits falling

 

MWM comments on this forecast: This forecast shows how robust the Eurasian economy is becoming even as the North American economy winds down.  No doubt a good portion of this strength is a recycling of Bush's warbucks and petrodollars from Arab, Indian, and Chinese demand for European products and services.  See below the EU article for the latest independent professional projections for the U.S.

 

This suggest strongly that the downturn in the U.S. will continue to escalate during 2007 and will not reach its full strength until the end of 2007.  Apparently my projections in the "Coming Economic Collapse of 2006" based on Cayce's 24/25 year cycle are almost a year "early", although it is already clear that the economy is sliding as a result of the bursting of the housing bubble. This suggests that the projection of the Europeans for 2008 is too rosy.  The American slide is likely to bring a loss of at least one third of the value in equity markets and  depression of values of this magnitude this will bring down economic optimism all over the planet.  Thus 2008 is likely to see a worldwide downturn begin as a reflection of a depression setting into the U.S. PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT ALL OF THIS IS WELL WITHIN THE TIME-FRAME OF THE CAYCE PREDICTION.

 
______________________________________
Reference: IP/06/1508 Date: 06/11/2006
IP/06/1508 Brussels, 6 November 2006

http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/1508&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
Autumn economic forecasts 2006-2008: solid growth and unemployment and deficits falling
Economic growth in 2006 is set to reach 2.8% in the European Union and 2.6% in the euro area, up from 1.7% and 1.4% in 2005, according to the Commission’s autumn economic forecasts. The main impulses are robust growth in domestic demand, especially investment, and sustained global growth. The economic activity should ease somewhat in 2007 and 2008 reflecting the global outlook and, in particular, the slowdown in the United States. Yet, GDP growth is projected to remain around potential in the next two years (EU: 2.4% in both 2007 and 2008; euro area: 2.1% in 2007 and 2.2% in 2008). The EU as a whole is expected to create 7 million new jobs over the period 2006-2008 (5 million in the euro area). This will help increase the employment rate from 63¾ % in 2005 to 65½ % in 2008 while reducing unemployment from a peak of more than 9% of the labour force in 2004 to 7.3% in 2008 in the EU (7.4% in the euro area). Inflation is also forecast to gradually decline to below the ECB's 2% inflation threshold in the euro area in 2008.


“After years of disappointing results, the European Union economy in 2006 will be at its best since the beginning of the decade and is expected to grow at around potential in 2007 and 2008. This shows the benefits of economic reforms and budgetary consolidation in an environment of a strong global economy and ought to encourage Member States to pursue on what is the only road capable of delivering strong and better growth and more jobs” said Joaquín Almunia, the Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner.


The Commission’s economic forecasts published today project that this year’s economic growth will reach 2.8% in the EU and 2.6% in the euro area, i.e. more than 1 percentage point (pp.) above last year’s growth and ½ pp higher than forecast six months ago. Looking ahead, economic activity is projected to moderate to 2.4% in both 2007 and 2008 in the EU and 2.1% in 2007 and 2.2% in 2008 in the euro area.


The upward revision of the forecasts follows the better-than-expected outcome of the first half of 2006. Real GDP growth rose by 0.8% quarter-on-quarter in the first quarter and by 0.9% in the second quarter of 2006 in both the EU and the euro area. This is the strongest pace of expansion in six years.


Economic growth is being underpinned by robust domestic demand, in particular investment that rose at an annualised rate of 6% in the first half of 2006 and should remain solid in view of steady increases in capacity utilisation, improved corporate balance sheets, benign financial conditions and wide profit margins. Investment in equipment, especially, is set to grow by more than 5% in 2006, before moderating somewhat in 2007-2008. Consumer spending is expected to pick up more gradually, mirroring an improved labour market. Exports, on the other side, continue to be supported by the strong world economy. The more balanced growth pattern in the EU and the euro area and the ongoing structural reforms should provide the basis for some increase in potential growth, leading to a more sustained expansion than in past upturns.


Unemployment, inflation and deficits: all on a downward path


Employment growth accelerated markedly in the first half of this year, reflecting the beneficial effects of the structural reforms in both product and labour markets as well as a renewed confidence in the economy. Overall, the EU is expected to create 7 million new jobs over the period 2006-2008, including 5 million in the euro area. This is almost twice the rate of job creation that was seen in the euro area in the previous three-year period and ¾ higher in the EU as a whole. As a result, the employment rate is expected to reach 65½% in 2008, up from 63¾% in 2005.


After peaking at around 9% in 2004 in both EU and euro area areas, the unemployment rate is set to decline in 2006 to around 8% in both areas and to fall further to 7.3% in the EU and 7.4% in the euro area by 2008.


Labour productivity growth is also strengthening, which coupled with rising investment and employment will have a beneficial impact. The long-term decline in potential growth has been reversed since 2004 and trend growth is projected to continue to rise gradually to 2.3% in 2008 in the EU (2.1% in the euro area).

 

Inflation has remained remarkably stable this year at an expected 2.2%, while it is set to rise from 2.2% to 2.3% in the EU. Core inflation remains subdued, indicating that the oil price hikes have not had any significant second-round effects. As the forecast assumes that such effects will continue to be largely absent, headline inflation is projected to stay just above 2% over the forecast period in both areas in 2007 and to decline below 2% in 2008 in the euro area.


Public finances also turn out to be better than expected in the spring with the average budget deficit seen at 2% of GDP this year (in both EU and euro area), down from 2.3% in the EU and 2.4% in the euro area in 2005, mainly on the back of higher-than-expected tax revenues. Despite this overall improvement, five Member States, including two euro-area members, are still running a deficit of more than 3% of GDP this year. Based on the available 2007 budgets and the usual assumption of no policy change thereafter, the general government deficit is estimated to decline to 1.6% in 2007 and 1.4% in 2008 in the EU (1.5% and 1.3% respectively in the euro area).


Global outlook remains bright, but risks persist


Growth in the EU is supported by a robust global economy. World growth is projected at 5.1% this year, marginally below the record high attained in 2004. But it is likely to ease somewhat at the turn of this year, predominantly due to the projected slowdown in the US, while other growth poles will continue to expand at high rates. World GDP growth is projected to moderate to just above 4½% in 2007-2008.


At the same time, the external sector also poses risks to the economic outlook. A more marked slowdown in the US would have a negative impact on growth. A disorderly unwinding of global current account imbalances also remains a risk.


But there are also chances for a better-than-expected outcome. World trade could prove more vibrant, especially in Asia. On the domestic side, the labour market performance, in particular, could improve more strongly than forecast, giving an extra boost to private consumption.


Finally, recent years have taught us that oil prices could go both ways. Geopolitical tensions could lead to new oil price hikes, but a weaker demand would put a downward pressure on prices that could, in turn, mitigate the extent and spill-over impact of a US slowdown.
The full Commission autumn economic forecasts are available on the internet at:
http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/about/activities/activities_keyindicatorsforecasts_en.htm

 

MWM:  Now check out below this key indicator of the sliding downturn in the U.S.

 

Can the Economy Survive the Housing Bust?

Fortune on CNNMoney.com
By Jon Birger

Real estate downturns have a way of leading to recessions and stock market slumps. So far the damage has been limited, but the numbers keep getting worse, says Fortune's Jon Birger.

Tucked away in the briefcase of Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab & Co., is a chart so scary she's hesitant to show it to investors. It plots the National Association of Home Builders' Housing Market index - a monthly measure of builder confidence - against the Standard & Poor's 500 stock market index, with a one-year lag.

It turns out that the mood of builders is a terrific stock market bellwether: The correlation between current builder confidence and future stock market returns over the past ten years is downright unnerving.

Not only did the NAHB index presage the start of the post-1994 bull market in stocks, but its decline starting in 1999 foreshadowed the equity market collapse that came the following year. Builder confidence rebounded in November 2001 - a year ahead of the stock market upswing that began in October 2002.

Why is Sonders worried now? Just look at the chart. Over the past year, the NAHB housing index plummeted 54 percent. Were stocks to follow suit, the S&P - 1400 in late October - would be trading below 700 this time next year.

Sonders isn't predicting anything so apocalyptic, but she doesn't hide her concern about housing and her pessimism about stocks.

"In terms of consumer spending, I don't think we've felt anywhere near the brunt of all the adjustable-rate-mortgage resets and the massive increase in defaults and foreclosures in states like California," she says. "Housing downturns happen in a fairly slow-motion way, and I really think we're just at the beginning of the impact on the market and the economy."

The latest omen: GDP grew at its slowest pace in three years in the third quarter, hurt by the housing slump.

Such bearishness flies in the face of the euphoria now rampant on Wall Street. The Dow Jones industrial average keeps hitting new highs, and the S&P is a stone's throw away from its own record (although in inflation-adjusted terms, they're still below their peaks).

Third-quarter earnings? One report seems better than the next, with key companies like Google (92 percent profit growth), IBM (54 percent), and Bank of America (41 percent) all posting stellar numbers.

"The effects of the housing correction will be entirely contained within the housing sector," says Mike Englund, chief economist of Action Economics. Corporate balance sheets are stronger than they've been in years, with U.S. companies sitting on $600 billion in cash. Interest rates are stable, and may decline. Falling energy prices are easing the burden on energy-intensive industries like chemicals and airlines.

And as PNC chief investment strategist Jeff Kleintop points out, there have been only two midterm election years since World War II when the stock market did not stage a fourth-quarter rally. The bulls' bottom line: Housing may be a risk factor, but there's too much other good news for it to be the catalyst for a recession or stock market meltdown.

That may turn out to be wishful thinking. All the economic activity generated by home sales - new mortgages, realtor fees, outlays to painters and handymen, the inevitable shopping trips to Home Depot and Best Buy - played a huge part in digging the economy out of a recession in 2001 and 2002. Given the importance of home sales on the way up, it may be shortsighted to minimize their importance on the way down.

"The historical record is extremely negative in terms of what comes next," says economist Ed Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast. "We've had 11 sharp declines in the housing market since World War II, including this one. Eight of the last ten were followed by a recession."

For now, there's little hard evidence that the housing slowdown is dragging down the economy. Construction materials like concrete, wallboard and structural steel should be the canaries in the economic coal mine, yet their prices keep climbing.

Construction-related employment has been rising too - up fractionally from August to September and up 3 percent over the past 12 months, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

But folks in the trenches paint a much darker picture, lending credence to the idea that we're living through the lag - the period before the realities on the street show up in economists' spreadsheets.

 

 

MWM:  Now go here for a geostrategic  situational analysis:

 

The Dollar's Full-System Meltdown
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15440.htm
By Mike Whitney
 

MWM comments:  some points in this article below are a bit over-stated in my opinion but the overall logic of the situation outline here is a reasonable assessment in the light of everything I know.  Essentially, during the year ahead there will be continued aggressive pressure on the dollar.  The Rockefeller Cabal will have its hands full moving its bucks around to retain value.  Some loss is inevitable.  Expect at least 10% but be prepared for 50%.


10/30/06 "Information Clearing House" -- --
The U.S. Dollar is kaput. Confidence in the currency is eroding by the day.

A report in The Sydney Morning Herald stated, “Australia’s Treasurer Peter Costello has called on East Asia’s central bankers to ‘telegraph’ their intentions to diversify out of American investments and ensure an ‘orderly adjustment’….Central banks in China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong have channeled immense foreign reserves into American government bonds, helping to prop up the US dollar and hold down interest rates,’ said Costello, but ‘the strategy has changed.’”

Indeed, the strategy has changed. The world has come to its senses and is moving away from the green slip of paper that is currently mired in $8.3 trillion of debt.

The central banks now want to reduce their USD reserves while trying to do as little damage to their own economies as possible. That’ll be difficult. If a sell-off ensues, it will start a stampede for the exits.

There’s little hope of an “orderly adjustment” as Costello opines; that’s just false optimism. When the greenback begins listing; things will turn helter-skelter quickly.

In September, we saw early signs that the dollar was in trouble. The trade deficit registered at $70 billion but the Net Foreign Security Purchases (NFSP) came in at a paltry $33 billion. That means that our main trading partners are no longer buying back our debt which puts downward pressure on the greenback. The Fed had two choices; either raise interest rates substantially or let the currency fall. Given the tenuous condition of the housing bubble and the proximity of the midterm elections, the Fed did neither.

A month later, in October, the trade deficit hit $69.9 billion but, then, without warning, a miracle occurred. The Net Foreign Security Purchases skyrocketed to a “historic high” of $116.8 billion; covering both months’ shortfalls almost to the penny.

Coincidence?

Not likely. Either the skittish central banks decided to “stock up” on their dollar-denominated investments or the Federal Reserve (and their banking-buddies) is buying back its own debt to float us through the elections.

This is exactly the kind of hanky-panky that people expected when Greenspan stopped publishing the M-3 last March keeping the rest of us in the dark about what was really going on with the money supply.

Are we supposed to believe that the skeptical central banks suddenly doubled up on their T-Bills while they’re (publicly) moaning about the dollar’s weakness and threatening to diversify?

That’s a stretch.

According to the Wall Street Journal the Chinese Central-bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan stated unequivocally that “We think we’ve got enough.” The Chinese presently have nearly $1 trillion in USD and US Treasuries.

“Enough”?

The United States runs a $200 billion per year trade deficit with China. If they’ve “got enough” we’re dead-ducks. After all, it doesn’t take a sell-off to kill the dollar, just unwillingness on the part of the main players to stop purchasing at the same rate.


Of course, everyone in Washington already knew that doomsday was approaching. That’s the way the system was designed from the very beginning. It’s all part of the madcap scheme to “starve the beast” and transfer the nation’s wealth to a handful of western plutocrats. That’s explains why the Fed and the White House whirred along like two spokes on the same wheel; every policy calculated to thrust the country headlong toward disaster.

The administration never created a funding mechanism for the $400 million tax cuts or for the 35% expansion of the Federal government. Defense spending increased by leaps and bounds as did the “no-bid” contracts for friends of the Bush clan. At the same time, interest rates were lowered to rock-bottom to put as much money as possible into the hands of people who couldn’t meet the traditional criteria for a mortgage. And, if gluttonous waste, reckless overspending and “Mickey Mouse” loans were not enough; the Fed capped it off by doubling the money supply in 7 years; a surefire prescription for hyper-inflation.

So, which one of these policies was not deliberate?

The financial crisis that we now face was created by design. It is intended to destroy the labor movement, crush the middle class, quash Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, reduce our foreign debt by 50 or 60%, force a restructuring of America’s debt, privatize all public assets and resources, and create a new regime of austerity measures which will divert more wealth to the banking and corporate establishments.

The avatars of neoliberalism invariably use crooked politicians to spawn enormous “unsustainable” debt so that the nations’ riches can be transferred to ruling elites. It works the same everywhere. It’s a form of corporate colonization, only this time the victim is the good old USA.

“The Phase of Impact”

According to Richard Daughty in his prescient article “The Phase of Impact” the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Dept have already manned the battle-stations. Here’s an excerpt:

“Mr. Paulson, the Secretary of the Treasury, is, by virtue of his ascension to the throne, now the head of the shadowy President’s Working Group of Financial Markets (which was created by Presidential Order 12631) and he is insisting that they meet more often, namely every 6 weeks!

This whole Working Group thing was originally set up as a fallback, ad-hoc, if-then defense to deal with possible economic emergencies, but now they are routinely meeting every 6 weeks. He has even ordered Jim Wilkinson, his chief of staff, to ‘oversee the creation of a Treasury Command Center to track markets world-wide and serve as an operations base in a crisis”! (Wall Street Journal) World-wide!! The American government is moving to take control of the world-wide economy as the result of an anticipated crisis? Yikes!”

Daughty goes on to say: “So a lot of the hubbub is obviously being caused by some approaching upheaval, perhaps reflected in something sent to me by Phil S., which is the Global Europe Anticipation Bulletin No8 which reminded us that last May they predicted that the economy would have a ‘phase of acceleration’ that would begin in June, and it “would be spread out over a period of a maximum of 6 months’, which it subsequently did. They said then, and are saying again now, that a ‘phase of impact will begin in November 2006’, and that this impact phase would be the ‘explosive phase of the crisis’.

This ‘phase of impact’ that is due to begin momentarily is, they explain, ‘a period when a series of brutal crises starts affecting by contamination the total system. This explosive phase of the crisis, which will last 6 months to one year, will affect directly and very strongly financial players and markets, the owners of investment schemes with fixed incomes in dollars, pension funds and the strategic relations between the United States on the one side, and Europe and Asia on the other.” (Richard Daughty; “The Phase of Impact” Kitco.com)

Predictions, of course, are rarely reliable and Daughty’s scenario may be a bit too apocalyptic for many. But if we accept the premise that the tax cuts, the expansion of the federal government, the doubling of the money supply, and the $10 trillion that was sluiced into the housing bubble were not merely “honest mistakes” made by “supply side” enthusiasts; then we must assume that this is all part of a loony plan to demolish the economic foundation-blocks of the current system and remake society from the ground up.

Domestically, that plan appears to involve the activation of the police state.

In the last few weeks the Bush administration has passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 which allows the president to arrest and torture whomever he chooses without charging him with a crime. Also, unbeknownst to most Americans, Bush signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy, will allow the president to unilaterally declare martial law. By changing The Insurrection Act, Bush has essentially overturned the Posse Comitatus Act which bars the president from deploying troops with the United States. The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 (as it is called) also allows Bush to take control of the National Guard which has always been under the purview of the state governors. Bush now has absolute power over all armed troops within the country, a state of affairs which the constitution purposely tried to prevent. The administration’s dream of militarizing the country under the sole authority of the executive has now been achieved although the public still has no idea that a coup that has taken place.

Internationally, the falling dollar means that America’s debt will be reduced proportionate to the percentage-loss of the dollar in relation to other currencies. This is a great deal for the U.S. First the Fed prints fiat money to buy valuable resources and manufactured goods and then it nabs a discount by depreciating its currency. It’s a “win-win” situation for Washington, although it will undoubtedly cheat unwitting foreign-creditors out of their hard-earned profits. It’s doubtful that their interests will weigh very heavily on the money-lenders at the US Treasury or the Federal Reserve.

The dollar faces a second crisis at home which is bound to play out throughout 2007. The $10 trillion dollar housing bubble is quickly losing air causing a precipitous drop in GDP. The housing industry is seeing its steepest decline in 30 years and home equity is beginning to shrivel. Housing has been the one bright spot in an otherwise bleak economic landscape. With the housing market slowing down and prices decreasing, the $600 billion of consumer spending which was extracted in 2005 from home equity will quickly evaporate triggering an overall slowdown in the economy. (Consumer spending is 70% of GDP)

By the Fed’s own calculations; “The total amount of residential housing wealth in the US just about doubled between 1999 and 2006 up from $10.4 trillion to $20.4 trillion. (“Times Online”) If these figures are accurate than we can assume that much of America’s “perceived” growth has been nothing more than the expansion of debt. In fact, that seems to be the case. Wages have been stagnant since the 1970s, 3 million manufacturing jobs have been outsourced, savings have shrunk to below 0%, and personal debt is soaring. We have become an “asset-based” society and when the principle asset begins to loose its value, we are in deep trouble. As housing prices continue to decline through 2007 we can expect a full-blown recession. If energy prices rear their ugly head again, (were they lowered for the elections?) it will just be that much worse.

So, how will recession affect the dollar?

Capital has no loyalties. It follows the markets. When America’s bustling consumer market stalls, we’ll undergo capital flight just like everywhere else. The 3 million lost manufacturing jobs, the 200,000 lost high-paying high-tech jobs, the tax incentives for major corporations doing business outside the country; all signal that corporate America has already loaded the boats and is headed for more promising markets in Asia and Europe. A sluggish consumer market could further weaken the dollar and force Americans to begin saving again but, (and here’s the surprising part) the decision-makers at the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Dept don’t really care if the face-value of the greenback goes down anyway.

What really matters is that the dollar retains its position as the world’s reserve currency. That allows the Federal Reserve to continue to print the money, set the interest rates, and control the global economic system. The dollar presently accounts for 66% of foreign currency reserves in central banks across the globe, an increase of nearly 10% in one decade alone. The dollar has become the international currency, a de-facto monopoly. This is the goal of the globalists and the American ruling elite who dream of one system, the dollar-system; with us running it.

So, how will this cadre of plutocrats coerce the other nations to continue to use the dollar while it plummets from its perch?

Oil.

As long as oil is denominated in dollars, the central banks will be forced to stockpile American scrip regardless of its value. It’s no different than holding a gun to someone’s head. They will use our debt-plagued greenbacks or their cars and trucks will sputter, their tractors and factories will wheeze, and their economies will grind to a halt. It’s just that simple.

America cannot maintain its superpower status unless it continues to control the global economic system. That means the linkage between the dollar and oil must be preserved. The Bush troupe sees this as an existential issue upon which the future of America’s ruling class depends. By 2020, 60% of the world’s oil will come from the Middle East. Bush will do everything in his power to control the resources of the Caspian Basin, thereby expanding US dollar-hegemony and paving the way for a new American century.