| |
War &
Peace:
Links
to: ALMANAC |
|
EARTH MONITOR
[4-7-08] British fear US
commander is beating the drum for Iran strikes
By Damien McElroy
Foreign Affairs Correspondent
04/04/08 "The Telegraph" -- -- British officials gave warning
yesterday that
America's commander in Iraq will declare that Iran is waging war
against the
US-backed Baghdad government.
A strong statement from General David Petraeus about Iran's
intervention in
Iraq could set the stage for a US attack on Iranian military
facilities,
according to a Whitehall assessment. In closely watched testimony in
Washington next week, Gen Petraeus will state that the Iranian
threat has
risen as Tehran has supplied and directed attacks by militia
fighters
against the Iraqi state and its US allies.
The outbreak of Iraq's worst violence in 18 months last week with
fighting
in Basra and the daily bombardment of the Green Zone diplomatic
enclave,
demonstrated that although the Sunni Muslim insurgency is
dramatically
diminished, Shia forces remain in a strong position to destabilise
the
country.
"Petraeus is going to go very hard on Iran as the source of attacks
on the
American effort in Iraq," a British official said. "Iran is waging a
war in
Iraq. The idea that America can't fight a war on two fronts is
wrong, there
can be airstrikes and other moves," he said.
"Petraeus has put emphasis on America having to fight the battle on
behalf
of Iraq. In his report he can frame it in terms of our soldiers
killed and
diplomats dead in attacks on the Green Zone."
Tension between Washington and Tehran is already high over Iran's
covert
nuclear programme. The Bush administration has not ruled out
military
strikes.
In remarks interpreted as signalling a change in his approach to
Iran, Gen
Petraeus last week hit out at the Iranian leadership. "The rockets
that were
launched at the Green Zone were Iranian-provided, Iranian-made
rockets," he
said. "All of this in complete violation of promises made by
President
Ahmadinejad and the other most senior Iranian leaders to their Iraqi
counterparts."
The humiliation of the Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki by the
Iranian-backed cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in fighting in Basra last week
triggered top-level warnings over Iran's strength in Iraq.
Gen Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Baghdad, will
answer
questions from American political leaders at the US Congress on
Tuesday and
Wednesday before travelling to London to brief Gordon Brown.
The Wall Street Journal said last week that the US war effort in
Iraq must
have a double goal.
"The US must recognise that Iran is engaged in a full-up proxy war
against
it in Iraq," wrote the military analyst Kimberly Kagan.
There are signs that targeting Iran would unite American politicians
across the bitter divide on Iraq. "Iran is the bull in the china
shop," said Ike Skelton, the Democrat chairman of the Armed Services
Committee. "In all of this, they seem to have links to all of the
Shi'ite groups, whether they be political or military."
[3-17-2008]
WAR RISK IS STILL HIGH. IT IS NO LONGER DECLINING. We
CAME a long way during the past 12 months out of the crazed war
psychosis induced by the Cheney-Bush Junta. But strategic
plans and manipulations are obviously underway to push the envelope
on existing conditions.
The risk of another major False Flag
Terrorism incident may be building rapidly. Some project as
early as May 2008, some are more inclined to posit the early Fall,
in time to sway the U.S. elections for the "Return of the Gipper"
John McCain. The recent sacking of Admiral Fallon as Supreme
U.S. Commander In the Middle East, who is widely known for his
belief that increased military activity is not appropriate for U.S.
national interests, is the most obvious tip-off. Many
scenarios are possible, but a contrived false flag operation against
Israel may be the preferred operation. Such an operation is
far less likely to be scrutinized by hostile eyes because it will be
too far removed. Israel could then rationalize a national war
response, engage in strikes against its next target (likely the
brutalization of Syria), and thus force the hands of all parties
into a series of responses which escalate into U.S. and Iranian
intervention and mutual war.
for more discussion see,
Geo-Politics Almanac
Economy:
Links
to: ALMANAC |
|
EARTH MONITOR
Behind the inflation is the:
The Great Oil Swindle
How Much Did The Fed Really Know?
By Mike Whitney
5-31-8
The Commodity Futures and Trading Commission (CFTC) is investigating
trading in oil futures to determine whether the surge in prices to
record levels is the result of manipulation or fraud. They might
want to take a look at wheat, rice and corn futures while they're at
it. The whole thing is a hoax cooked up by the investment banks and
hedge funds who are trying to dig their way out of the trillion
dollar mortgage-backed securities (MBS) mess that they created by
turning garbage loans into securities. That scam blew up in their
face last August and left them scrounging for handouts from the
Federal Reserve. Now the billions of dollars they're getting from
the Fed is being diverted into commodities which is destabilizing
the world economy; driving gas prices to the moon and triggering
food riots across the planet. For months we've been told that the
soaring price of oil has been the result of Peak Oil, fighting in
Iraq, attacks on oil facilities in Nigeria, labor problems in
Norway, and (the all-time favorite)growth in China. It's all
baloney. Just like Goldman Sachs prediction of $200 per barrel oil
is baloney. If oil is about to skyrocket then why has G-Sax kept a
neutral rating on some of its oil holdings like Exxon Mobile? Could
it be that they know that oil is just another mega-inflated equity
bubble---like housing, corporate bonds and dot.com stocks-that is
about to crash to earth as soon as the big players grab a parachute?
There are three things that are driving up the price of oil: the
falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin. The dollar is
tanking because of the Federal Reserve's low interest monetary
policies have kept interest rates below the rate of inflation for
most of the last decade. Add that to the $700 billion current
account deficit and a National Debt that has increased from $5.8
trillion when Bush first took office to over $9 trillion today and
it's a wonder the dollar hasn't gone "Poof" already. According to
a January 4 editorial in the Wall Street Journal: "If the dollar had
remained 'as good as gold' since 2001, oil today would be selling at
about $30 per barrel, not $99. (today $126 per barrel) The decline
of the dollar against gold and oil suggests a US monetary that is
supplying too many dollars." Wall Street Journal 1-4-08 The price of
oil has more than quadrupled since 2001, from roughly $30 per barrel
to $126, WITHOUT ANY DISRUPTIONS TO SUPPLY. There's no shortage;
it's just gibberish. As far as "buying on margin" consider this
summary from author William Engdahl: "A conservative calculation is
that at least 60% of today's $128 per barrel price of crude oil
comes from unregulated futures speculation by hedge funds, banks and
financial groups using the London ICE Futures and New York NYMEX
futures exchanges and uncontrolled inter-bank or Over-The-Counter
trading to avoid scrutiny. US margin rules of the government's
Commodity Futures Trading Commission allow speculators to buy a
crude oil futures contract on the Nymex, by having to pay only 6% of
the value of the contract. At today's price of $128 per barrel, that
means a futures trader only has to put up about $8 for every barrel.
He borrows the other $120. This extreme "leverage" of 16 to 1 helps
drive prices to wildly unrealistic levels and offset bank losses in
sub-prime and other disasters at the expense of the overall
population." So the investment banks and their trading partners at
the hedge funds can game the system for a mere 8 bucks per barrel or
16 to 1 leverage. Not bad, eh? Is it possible that gambling on oil
futures might be a temptation for banks that are already underwater
from a trillion dollars worth of mortgage-related deals that have
"gone south" leaving the banking system essentially bankrupt? And if
the banks and hedgies are not playing this game, then where is the
money coming from? I have compiled charts and graphs that show that
nearly two-thirds of the big investment banks' revenue came from the
securitization of commercial and residential real estate loans. That
market is frozen. Besides, this is not just a matter of "loan
delinquencies" or MBS that have to be written off. The banks are
"revenue starved". How are they filling the coffers? They're either
neck-deep in interest rate swaps, derivatives trading, or gaming the
futures market. Which is it? Of course, there is one other
possibility, but if that possibility turned out to be right than it
would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the entire financial system.
In fact, it would prove that the system is being rigged from the
top-down by our friends at the Banking Politburo, the Federal
Reserve. Here goes: What if the investment banks are trading their
worthless MBS and CDOs at the Fed's auction facilities and using the
money ($400 billion) to drive up the price of raw materials like
rice, corn, wheat, and oil? Could it be? Could the Fed really be
looking the other way so it can bail out its banking buddies while
they drive prices skyward? If it is true; (and I suspect it is) it
hasn't done much good. As the Associated Press reported yesterday:
"The Federal Reserve announced Thursday that it will make a fresh
batch of short-term cash loans available to squeezed banks as part
of an ongoing effort to ease stressed credit markets. The Fed said
it will conduct three auctions in June, with each one making $75
billion available in short-term cash loans. Banks can bid for a
slice of the available funds. It would mark the latest round in a
program that the Fed launched in December to help banks overcome
credit problems so they will keep lending to customers." Another
$225 billion for the bankers and not a dime for the struggling
homeowner! The Fed is bankrupting the country with their permanent
rotating loans to keep reckless speculators from going under. So
much for moral hazard. As far as speculation, there is ample
evidence that the system is being manipulated. According to
MarketWatch: "Speculative activity in commodity markets has grown
"enormously" over the past several years, the Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee said in a news release. It pointed
out that in five years, from 2003 to 2008, investment in the index
funds tied to commodities has grown by 20-fold -- to $260 billion
from $13 billion." And here's a revealing clip from the testimony of
Michael W. Masters of Masters Capital Management, LLC, who addressed
the issue of "Commodities Speculation" before the Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs this week: "Today, Index
Speculators are pouring billions of dollars into the commodities
futures markets, speculating that commodity prices will increase.
...In the popular press the explanation given most often for rising
oil prices is the increased demand for oil from China. According to
the DOE, annual Chinese demand for petroleum has increased over the
last five years from 1.88 billion barrels to 2.8 billion barrels, an
increase of 920 million barrels.8 Over the same five-year period,
Index Speculators' demand for petroleum futures has increased by 848
million barrels. THE INCREASE IN DEMAND FROM INDEX SPECULATORS IS
ALMOST EQUAL TO THE INCREASE IN DEMAND FROM CHINA. Index
Speculators have now stockpiled, via the futures market, the
equivalent of 1.1 billion barrels of petroleum, effectively adding
eight times as much oil to their own stockpile as the United States
has added to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the last five
years. Today, in many commodities futures markets, they are the
single largest force.15 The huge growth in their demand has gone
virtually undetected by classically-trained economists who almost
never analyze demand in futures markets. As money pours into the
markets, two things happen concurrently: the markets expand and
prices rise. One particularly troubling aspect of Index Speculator
demand is that it actually increases the more prices increase. This
explains the accelerating rate at which commodity futures prices
(and actual commodity prices) are increasing. The CFTC has taken
deliberate steps to allow CERTAIN SPECULATORS VIRTUALLY UNLIMITED
ACCESS TO THE COMMODITIES FUTURES MARKETS. The CFTC has granted Wall
Street banks an exemption from speculative position limits when
these banks hedge over-the-counter swaps transactions. This has
effectively opened a loophole for unlimited speculation. When Index
Speculators enter into commodity index swaps, which 85-90% of them
do, they face no speculative position limits.... The result is a
gross distortion in data that effectively hides the full impact of
Index Speculation." (Thanks to Mish's Global Economic Trend
Analysis; the one "indispensable" financial blog on the Internet)
Masters adds that the CFTC is pressing to make "Index Speculators
exempt from all position limits" so they can make "unlimited" bets
on the futures which are wreaking havoc on the global economy and
pushing millions towards starvation. Of course, these things pale in
comparison to the higher priority of fatting the bottom line of the
parasitic investor class. Brimming oil tankers are presently sitting
off the coasts of Iran and Louisiana. The Strategic Petroleum
Reserve has been filled. Demand is flat. The world's biggest
consumer of energy (guess who?) is cutting back . As CNN reports:
"At a time when gas prices are at an all-time high, Americans have
curtailed their driving at a historic rate. The Department of
Transportation said figures from March show the steepest decrease in
driving ever recorded. Compared with March a year earlier, Americans
drove an estimated 4.3 percent less -- that's 11 billion fewer
miles, the DOT's Federal Highway Administration said Monday, calling
it "the sharpest yearly drop for any month in FHWA history." (CNN)
The great oil crunch is another fabricated crisis; another "smoke
and mirrors" fiasco; another Enron-type shell-game engineered by
banksters and hedge fund managers. Once again, the bloody footprints
can be traced right back to the front door of the Federal Reserve.
Don't expect help from the regulators either; they've all been
replaced with business reps like Harvey Pitt or Hank Paulson. The
only time anyone in the Bush administration finds their conscience
is when they're offered a multi-million dollar "tell all" book
deal. Can you hear me, Scotty?
[4-7-08] Bernanke joins G-7 to Stem Global Financial Meltdown
By Mike Whitney
06/04/08 "ICH" -- - In a recent interview with the New York Times,
former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O' Neill, was asked how the
problems with subprime mortgages could lead to a financial crisis of
global proportions. O' Neill said,
“If you have 10 bottles of water, and one bottle has poison in it,
and you don't know which one, you probably won’t drink out of any of
the 10 bottles; that’s basically what we’ve got here.”
Bulls-eye. O' Neill's answer is the best yet for explaining a
complex situation in simple terms. The term “subprime” is a red
herring; it is used by the media to minimize what is really going
on. The meltdown in financing extends across the entire range of
mortgage-security products. No loan-type has been spared. The
wholesale market for anything connected to mortgages is frozen and
the details are being intentionally withheld from the public. Two
years ago, more than 65 percent of all mortgages were converted into
securities and sold off to Wall Street. No more. That scam unraveled
in July when two Bear Stearns hedge funds blew up and their were no
takers for billions of dollars of mortgage-backed junk. Since then,
bankers and hedge fund managers have been scrambling to conceal the
facts about what mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are really worth;
nothing. The fear is that when the public finds out what is really
going on, they'll draw the logical conclusion that the banking
system is bankrupt, which it probably is. Just look at these
eye-popping losses which appeared in Bloomberg News on April 1 The
financial ship is listing, and the mainstream media is doing its
best to keep the public in the dark.
So for the last eight months, a simple matter of “price discovery”
on publicly traded securities has been a nonstop game of
hide-n-seek. That's no way to run a free market. The recent
collapses of Bear Stearns and Carlye Capital are just the latest
additions to this ongoing farce. Carlyle was a $22 billion hedge
fund that couldn't scrape together a measly $400 billion to meet a
margin call. Why? Every analyst who wrote on the topic noted that
the fund was loaded up with high-quality Triple-A and GSE (Fannie
Mae) bonds. So what were they offered for their MBS? That question
was never answered because Fed chief Ben Bernanke rode to the rescue
and created a new $200 billion auction facility and
�Whoosh---Carlyle's mortgage-backed junk disappeared down a black
hoole. How convenient; another Fed bailout to hide the damning
evidence that trillions of dollars of MBSs are utterly worthless and
devouring the financial system from the inside.
Bernanke's myriad auction facilities (four, so far) are ostensibly
designed to remove these mortgage-backed stinkers from the banks'
balance sheets so they can start lending again. But there's another
reason, too. The Fed thinks they can simply put these MBSs in
cold-storage for a while and then re-thaw them when the market
bounces back. But the market for MBSs won't bounce back. This is
biggest housing bust in US history and prices have a long way to go.
Who is going to invest in mortgage-backed bonds when the underlying
asset is losing value every day? Besides, as Paul O' Neill points
out; one of the bottles contains poison and investors don't like
poison. So, Bernanke is stuck trying to treat with the symptoms
rather than the disease. As a scholar of the Great Depression, he's
been rifling through his bag o' tricks to mitigate the damage, but
without success. The rate-cuts and auction facilities have been a
complete flop. The situation is worse now than it was in July; much
worse. In fact, the develeraging of financial institutions is
accelerating at a pace that no one expected threatening some of Wall
Streets' biggest players and putting $500 trillion in counterparty
agreements at risk. And it all began with eliminating the basic
standards for issuing loans to credit-worthy applicants; the straw
that broke the camel's back. Now the whole system is crumbling and
an ominous sense of doom pervades trading floors across the planet.
Everyone is just waiting for the next shoe drop.
Pimco's Bill Gross said, “What we are seeing is the collapse of the
modern day banking system”. American-style capitalism is in
crisis-mode and the outcome is far from certain. The Fed's
interventions show that the long held belief that markets are
self-correcting has vanished. Laissez-faire is out; regulation is
in.
Bloomberg News summed it up like this:
“It is no coincidence that the crisis of 2007 and 2008 had its
origin in unregulated financial products traded in unregulated
markets. Ever since the Great Depression, the government has tried
to limit the leverage available to the public in the American stock
market. But regulators, led by Alan Greenspan, the former chairman
of the Federal Reserve, thought it would hamper innovation, and
drive financial activity overseas, if there were any attempts to
impose limits on leverage in the unregulated markets.
To avoid a super-bubble in the future, (the) banks must control
their own borrowing. They must also curtail lending to clients such
as hedge funds by demanding greater collateral and margin
requirements on loans.” (Bloomberg News)
In Henry Liu's latest article in Asia Times, “A Panic-stricken
Federal Reserve”, Liu makes this observation on the Fed's auction
facilities which provide hundreds of billions of dollars in 28 day
loans in exchange for dubious mortgage-backed collateral:
"Since the Fed cannot retire loans made via TAF and its repo program
without adding to those 'elevated pressures', the loans should be
considered an equity infusion, because they’ll be repaid at the
convenience of the borrower rather than on a schedule agreed with
the lender." What Waldman did not say was that the Fed had ventured
into a broad nationalization of the prime dealers on Wall Street by
being an equity investor. (Quote,Steve Randy Waldman of
Interfluidity; Henry Liu, “A Panic-stricken Federal Reserve”)
Does the Fed realize that it is effectively monetizing the debt by
issuing loans that may not be repaid or is this just a clever way to
trick foreign investors into believing that the Fed won't print its
way out of a crisis? The bottom line is, whether the nation is
headed into a deflationary spiral or not; all of the Fed's tools are
inflationary. Rate cuts, auction facilities or covert monetization
all weaken the currency and levee an unfair tax on savers and people
on fixed incomes. Unfortunately, these people have no voice in
government, so we can't expect their interests to be fairly
represented.
Since housing peaked in 2005, 240 independently-owned mortgage
lenders have filed for bankruptcy. Wholesale funding sources have
dried up and foreclosures are on the rise. Now, more than 75 percent
of mortgages are funded by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac while another
10 percent are underwritten by FHA. The real estate industry has
been nationalized; another knock-on effect of Greenspan's low
interest monetary policy. Presently, the Fed and the Secretary of
the Treasury, Henry Paulson, are pushing to expand Fannie's and
Freddie's balance sheets so they can absorb bigger and riskier
mortgages. This is lunacy. Fannie Mae is already perilously
under-capitalized and, if it defaults, taxpayers will be on the hook
for $2.2 trillion. That doesn't seem to bother Paulson who is
determined to reflate the equity bubble so the profits keep rolling
in to Wall Street's coffers. Still, even if the plan goes forward,
it's unlikely that Paulson and Bernanke will be able to re-energize
the real estate market or ignite another housing boom. Public
attitudes have changed dramatically in the last few months. The myth
that “housing prices never going down” has been dispelled and high
levels of personal debt have forced many to reassess their spending
priorities. The American consumer has never been so over-extended.
According to Bloomberg:
Consumers fell behind on car, credit-card and home-equity loans at
the highest level in 15 years, another sign the U.S. economy is
slowing, according to the American Bankers Association's quarterly
survey. Payments at least 30 days past due increased across all
eight categories of loans tracked during the fourth quarter, the
Washington-based group said today in a statement. Late loans in the
quarter climbed 21 basis points to 2.65 percent of all accounts in a
consumer-loan index created by the group.
The American consumer is tapped-out. What he needs is a raise, not
another loan. Bush's $500 per person Stimulus Package will do
nothing to reverse the effects of 30 years of anti-labor legislation
and class-oriented monetary policy.
Another indication that attitudes towards spending have changed,
showed up in a survey conducted two weeks ago by USA Today/Gallup.
The poll released showed that 76 percent of Americans believe that
the country is now in recession and 59 percent think the US will
slide into a depression that will last for several years. Despite
the media's attempts to convince us that these are “the best of
times”; the public knows otherwise. Their pessimism is expressing
itself through curtailed spending. There's nothing the Fed can do to
change the prevailing mood of the country. Working people are
hurting. The spending spree is over.
The housing market will be dead for a generation. That means the MBS
market will falter and the multi-trillion dollar derivatives
monolith will continue to unwind. It will take emergency measures to
address the credit avalanche which is just now hitting the broader
economy.
The Bear Stearns bailout is a prime example of the extent to which
the Fed is willing to go to stop a meltdown. By approving the $30
billion dollar deal with JP Morgan, the Fed arbitrarily went beyond
its mandate of providing liquidity to the markets and usurped
Congress' authority to appropriate funds. It was a power-grab
engineered under shaky pretenses. The Fed isn't authorized to
prevent privately-owned businesses that are recklessly leveraged at
30 to 1 from defaulting. More importantly, the Federal Reserve is
not Congress, although they have now assumed those constitutional
duties. Speaker of the House Pelosi has said nothing so far.
Paulson has used the Bear fiasco as a platform for his blueprint for
“broad market reforms”; a 200-plus page document that removes
Congress from its role of overseeing the financial markets.
According to the New York Times:
“President Bush was preparing to issue an executive order soon to
expand the membership and reach of an interagency committee called
the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets. (aka; The Plunge
Protection Team) The group was created after the stock market
plummeted in 1987. The group is also expected to consider ways to
broaden the authority of the Federal Reserve to lend money to
nonbanks as needs arise. (Ed. note: To authorize more Bear Stearns
type bailouts with consulting Congress).....Elements of the plan are
clearly deregulatory. The plan proposes, for instance, to reduce the
enforcement authority of the S.E.C. in a variety of ways and hand
that authority instead to industry groups. The plan recommends that
investment advisers no longer be directly regulated by the
commission, but instead be supervised by an industry regulatory
organization.
The Treasury Department’s blueprint is designed to boost Wall
Street’s competitiveness, not Main Street investor protection,” said
Karen Tyler, president of the North American Securities
Administrators Association and the securities commissioner of North
Dakota.” (New York Times)
Congress is being muscled out of financial market supervision by a
troop of venal banksters and corporate picaroons who are threatening
to finish-off the already-defanged SEC. That will put the Fed in the
driver's seat for good. Paulson wants to police the world's most
complex markets on the “honor system”. It's crazy. His blueprint is
an obvious attempt to consolidate market-related functions under a
central authority that is accountable to private industry alone.
That way, the Fed can bailout whomever it chooses without
congressional approval. Paulson's press conference was just a polite
way of informing the American people that the seat of power has
shifted from Washington to Wall Street. It's a banker's coup.
So, where do we go from here? Pimco's Bill Gross gives us some
indication in this recent quote:
"In my opinion, the private credit markets have forfeited their
privileged right to operate relatively autonomously because of
incompetence, excessive greed, and in minor instances, fraudulent
activities. As a result, the deflating private market’s balance
sheet is being re-nationalized in some cases with increased
regulation, in others with outright guarantees and agency lending.
Ultimately government programs which support private credit market
assets may be required in order to prevent an asset deflation of
significant proportions. Authorities must act quickly, with a shot
of adrenalin straight to the heart of the problem: home prices.
Since homes are the most highly levered and monetarily significant
asset that American consumers own, if they decline much further they
will drag the rest of the economy with them."
“Re-nationalized”; is that what it is? No one authorized the Fed or
Paulson to re-nationalize anything. These over-leveraged banking
behemoths need to fail. Let the market work. 28 million Americans
are on food stamps, tent cities are sprouting up across the country,
discretionary spending is down, food and energy prices are
skyrocketing, and wages have been frozen for a generation. Where's
the bailout for the working man? Instead, the government's largess
is showered on a throng of unctuous fat-cat banksters so they can
keep the larder on Martha's Vineyard topped off with Godiva truffles
and Cuban cigars. Paulson has to go. Bernanke too.
An article in last week's New York Times, “Leveraged Planet”,
provides a great description of the Fed's activities during the
weekend of the Bear Stearns fiasco. Journalist Andrew Sorkin
recreates the frantic phone calls and panicky deal-making that went
on behind the scenes while the stock market was preparing for a
Monday morning blow-out:
“JUST before JP Morgan-Chase announced its initial $2-a-share deal
to buy Bear Stearns, Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal
Reserve, held an extraordinary impromptu conference call. The
participants on the Sunday night call, who got a preview of the
deal, were Wall Street’s biggest power brokers: Lloyd Blankfein of
Goldman Sachs dialed in from home. John Mack of Morgan Stanley
rushed to the office to listen on speakerphone. Richard Fuld of
Lehmann Brothers, who had been directed to return home from a
business trip in New Delhi by none other than Henry Paulson, the
Treasury secretary, was patched in, too, among others.
The half-hour call was a rallying cry for support of Bear Stearns �
and more broadly, the financial markets, which, as it was described
on the call, were on the verge of a major meltdown if not for the
pre-emptive steps that the Fed and JPMorgan took. “It was much worse
than anyone realized; the markets were on the precipice of a real
crisis,” said one participant. Given that Bear held trading
contracts with an outstanding value of $2.5 trillion with firms
around the world, “we were talking about the possibility of a global
run on the bank.” ( Andrew Sorkin, “Leveraged Planet” New York
Times)
Typical of the Times, the reader is left feeling that the wild and
destabilizing activities of one unregulated market participant, like
Bear, is as natural as a spring rain. There's not the slightest hint
that Bears' transgressions may have emerged from years of kicking
down regulatory doors and feeding campaign contributions into a
corrupt political system. That's way beyond the Times' range of
analysis. Instead, the heroes of this financial kabuki are none
other than the ashen-faced palatines at Fed and the Treasury who
deftly donned their Haz-mat suits long enough to battle the flames
of the banking inferno with a stream of taxpayer money. So much for
moral hazard.
If Bear had been properly policed; it would have been better
capitalized with considerably less leverage. Its $2.5 trillion of
derivatives contracts would have been regulated by government
officials to make sure that they posed no threat to the broader
system. Sorkin's recap just proves that the present stewards of the
system are bunglers who are out of their depth. After years of
serial bubble-making, they are finally begin to realize that their
neoliberal Golden Calf was built on a foundation of pure quicksand.
In fact, the sirens are already wailing as the yields on 3 month
Treasuries continue to plummet, which is the bond market's way of
perching itself atop the highest building in downtown Manhattan and
screaming, “FIRE!” There's no telling when the stock market will get
the message, but it shouldn't be too long.
CODE RED; Emergency planning now underway
So, what is to be done? New York Fed chief Timothy Geithner says
that capital markets are still “substantially impaired” and policy
makers and financial industry leaders must “act forcefully” to stem
the crisis.
“What we were observing in U.S. and global financial markets was
similar to the classic pattern in financial crises,'' Geithner said
in his prepared testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. He cited
``a self-reinforcing downward spiral'' of asset sales, ``higher
volatility, and still lower prices.” (Bloomberg News)
If Geithner's predictions of “a self-reinforcing downward spiral''
sound scary; so do the remedies. The Financial Times outlined the
radical strategies that are now under consideration by the G-7
powers for dealing with challenges of the rapidly-expanding credit
crisis. These include “the temporary suspension of capital
requirements, taxpayer-funded recapitalisation of banks and outright
public purchase of mortgage-backed securities.” Everything is on the
table.
Representatives from the main western central banks are also
discussing whether to force a number of the larger banks to disclose
their financial positions so they can objectively determine the
weaknesses on their balance sheets.
Other recommendations include boosting capital requirements,
“conserving financial resources”, and utilizing public funds. The
group is also deciding whether to “suspend capital and reporting
rules that tie prudential requirements to market values of
securities.” That way the banks can avoid letting shareholders know
the true downgraded value of their assets. This is clearly an
attempt to deceive the public about the real financial condition of
the banks.
“Emergency liquidity support”, reductions in capital requirements,
concealing the true value of collateral, relaxing regulations,
suspending accounting rules for assets; it sounds a lot like panic.
These are the signs of a system so dilapidated that the pilings
shake and the scaffolding wobbles with the slightest breeze. A
system that's held together with the frayed strands of collective
fear; bankers angst. Strike a match and the whole thing will go up
like a Roman candle.
“In order to change an existing paradigm you do not struggle to try
and change the problematic model. You create a new model and make
the old one obsolete.” Buckminster Fuller
[3-17-08 ECB]
As the mighty fall to the tarmac you are watching the crazy ersatz
quilt work of Globalism fall apart. That age is done, it lives
now only in the fantasy sections of the brains of those too stupid
to continue to hold the reigns of power they have usurped during the
past 60 years. The next eight years will accelerate change at all
levels, not least with escalating conflict and struggle between and
within the power elites. The old games, the old consensus, the old
economics are dying and cannot be made to work again. This is
Roosevelt's moment, and in this generation, Roosevelt is a black
man.
[3-10-08 ECB]
Bears are continuing to appear behind every bush. A growing
convergence of opinion is crystallizing around September/October as
an extreme peak moment for the meltdown of the imperial (globalist)
economy.
As the forces contend between
the factions, cliques, and money houses of the international "families",
numbers will gyrate, here advancing, there declining, but over all
thinning down to much lower levels. The year 2008 will be the year
of the Free Fall. This free fall is about one year later than
predicted in the "Economic Collapse of 2006", but all is on track as
discussed. The free fall should not be feared. It will be
extremely useful in sobering the Americans up from their drunken
Globalism bender. The agenda will suddenly change and a new
continental industrial agenda can come to the fore. There are many
new generational initiatives in the energy field which can be undertaken
to drive another decade long wave of rapidly growing prosperity.
Oil and computers will become increasingly secondary to alternative
energy, robotics, and health enhancement industries.
Politics:
Links
to: ALMANAC |
|
EARTH MONITOR
IMPEACHMENT WATCH
|
|